In an era of social media and non-stop news, we have access to a plethora of information on every possible subject. It’s therefore easy to find material that supports our reasoning and that comforts our beliefs. This goes even further: on social media, we “follow” people who think like us and we look at their posts and news first, which reinforces our own convictions.
Interpersonal “bubbles” are thus formed, particularly on very ideologically sensitive subjects such as politics, religion, veganism, GMOs, protest movements such as the gilets jaunes in France, etc. This leads to an even greater polarization of our society and reduces our mental flexibility – in other words, our aptitude to change our mind and our capacity to integrate any new information we’re exposed to in the least biased way possible. If I’m pro-gilets jaunes, I’m only going to see police brutality and omit there are also violent acts perpetrated by people from my group. On the contrary, if I’m against the gilets jaunes, I’m going to focus on the violence of the rioters and demonstrators without seeing that a large part of them are pacifists and that the police is sometimes violent.